top of page

The Impact of U.S. Rolling Back Energy Efficiency Policies on Canada’s Push for Net Zero Emissions

Sahar N.

Jan 24, 2025

Recent policy shifts in the United States under the administration of Trump, emphasizing deregulation in energy efficiency, have sparked significant debate regarding their potential impact on Canada’s environmental initiatives and economic landscape.

The U.S. administration's executive order focuses on reducing regulatory burdens associated with energy efficiency standards, allowing increased consumer choice for products like air conditioning systems, lighting, and vehicles. This shift challenges the trajectory of energy savings and environmental protection efforts that these regulations have supported. For instance, existing standards have reportedly saved the equivalent of carbon emissions from 44 million cars and generated household savings averaging $500 annually, according to studies from the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE).


Canada continues to forge ahead with stringent energy efficiency measures, crucial to achieving its net-zero emission targets. Central to this strategy is the transition from fossil-fuel-based heating systems to electric heat pumps, supported by substantial rebates from both federal and provincial governments (e.g., Oil to Heat Pump Affordability Program (OHPA), Canada Greener Homes Loan, Home Efficiency Rebate Plus etc.). These initiatives are designed to significantly cut residential emissions, which according to the Government of Canada, account for roughly 13% of national emissions.


As manufacturers adjust to U.S. regulatory rollbacks, significant impacts may arise for Canadian HVAC markets and key industry players like Mitsubishi Electric and Trane Canada. These companies, known for their cutting-edge, energy-efficient heating solutions, could find themselves compelled to align with less rigorous U.S. standards to maintain competitiveness across North American markets. This shift poses challenges in balancing economic efficiency with sustainable innovation.


For instance, Mitsubishi Electric, which emphasizes advanced heat pump technology, may need to explore diversified product lines to cater to differing regulatory landscapes between Canada and the U.S. Although noted for their high-efficiency HVAC systems, these companies could face increased operational complexity and costs associated with maintaining dual-compliant models.



Relaxed U.S. standards could complicate Canada’s efforts to access energy-efficient technologies, adversely affecting market offerings and potentially leading to increased costs for compliant systems. Reduced availability of high-efficiency products could slow the transition to electric heat pumps, stalling the pace of emissions reductions in residential heating, a critical component of Canada’s climate strategy. Environment and Climate Change Canada estimates that broader adoption of electric heating could reduce residential emissions by up to 60%.


The economic and policy interdependence between Canada and the U.S. often sees Canadian regulations influenced by U.S. standards, thanks to tightly knit trade relationships. However, in areas like environmental policy, Canada has occasionally deviated to set more progressive targets, such as banning incandescent bulbs in 2014—years ahead of similar U.S. moves.


With this nuanced relationship, Canada may need to bolster its policies to maintain leadership in energy efficiency. Policymaker support for high-efficiency technologies, further investment in domestic capacity, and strategic partnerships outside of the U.S., such as with the EU, can help mitigate potential disruptions.





The backdrop of impending tariff wars adds another layer of complexity. Trump's suggested imposition of a 25% tariff on Canadian imports threatens to disrupt existing trade flows and escalate economic tensions. Such tariffs could significantly affect Canadian manufacturers, especially those reliant on cross-border trade with the U.S. Like Mitsubishi Electric and Trane Canada, which might face cost increases that need to be passed on to consumers or absorbed, impacting competitiveness.


Tariffs might also influence Canada’s broader economic landscape if retaliatory measures are enacted, potentially affecting investment flows and economic stability. In response, Canadian policymakers could increase support through targeted subsidies or incentives to bolster domestic industries against these external pressures.


To effectively navigate these challenges, Canada should pursue policies that enhance its domestic production of energy-efficient technologies. Investments in research and development at companies like Mitsubishi Electric and Trane Canada could spur innovation and resilience, enabling these firms to meet both Canadian and international standards.


Additionally, diversifying trading partnerships can buffer against U.S. policy shifts, ensuring sustained economic growth. Expanding consumer education on energy efficiency benefits—paired with robust supports like smart grid infrastructure—will crucially align consumer behavior with national climate goals.


Ultimately, while U.S. policy and tariff strategies present challenges, through strategic adaptation and international collaboration, Canada can continue to lead in climate action and energy efficiency innovation. Such measures will ensure that Canada not only meets its net-zero commitments but remains a competitive, sustainable economy in the evolving global landscape.



* Background: Canada's Vision for Achieving Net-Zero Emissions by 2050


Understanding Net-Zero


Reaching net-zero emissions entails an economy where the amount of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emitted is balanced by actions that remove emissions from the atmosphere, such as reforestation or carbon capture technologies. This goal is vital for maintaining a habitable climate for future generations and aligns with global targets to mitigate the severe impacts of climate change.


The Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act


Enacted in June 2021, the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act formalizes Canada's commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. The legislation is designed to ensure accountability and transparency throughout the transition process, mandating public involvement and consulting independent advice to guide governmental efforts effectively. By establishing interim targets and deadlines, the Act enforces a structured approach to progressively reduce emissions.


2030 Emissions Reduction Plan: Clean Air, Strong Economy


The 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan (ERP) builds on previous initiatives like the Pan-Canadian Framework, aimed at substantial GHG reductions. This comprehensive plan, developed with input from multiple stakeholders, outlines Canada's commitment to meeting its Paris Agreement target by reducing emissions by 40-45% from 2005 levels by 2030.


Achievements include the introduction of policies such as the Clean Electricity Regulations and strengthened oil and gas methane regulations. Specifically, the ERP underscores notable progress since 2015, when emission trends suggested a potential nine percent increase over 2005 levels by 2030. Reversing this trajectory reflects significant strides across various sectors, positioning Canada realistically on track to exceed prior objectives, achieving a 30% reduction by 2030 and the interim 2026 target of a 20% reduction.

Recent Milestones


Recent accomplishments further solidify Canada’s path towards its climate goals. The publication of the Electric Vehicle Availability Standard and a regulatory framework targeting emissions from the oil and gas sector demonstrate a strong regulatory commitment. These efforts are instrumental in reducing future emissions, with updated projections set to provide further clarity in 2024.

The Role of the Net-Zero Advisory Body (NZAB)


Established in 2021, the NZAB plays a pivotal role in ensuring Canada’s net-zero emissions target is met. The NZAB delivers independent advice on key areas such as governance, industrial policy, and energy systems to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change. Its work emphasizes transparency and consistency, with annual reports to the Minister ensuring systematic evaluation of the progress. The second "What We Heard Report" reflects on engagement outcomes and public sentiments toward the government's climate action strategies, ensuring responsive and inclusive policy development.


The Net-Zero Challenge for the Private Sector


Recognizing the critical role of businesses, the Government has launched the Net-Zero Challenge, urging companies to adopt net-zero plans. This initiative has seen widespread participation across sectors including energy, transportation, and IT, showcasing corporate commitment to environmental stewardship. The private sector's engagement helps drive innovation and enhances Canada's competitive edge in a decarbonizing world economy, aligning economic growth with sustainable practices.


In addition to internal strategies, Canada must navigate external economic pressures, particularly potential tariff impositions by the U.S. administration under Trump. Proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports could challenge the competitiveness of Canadian industries, including those in the renewable and efficient technologies sectors such as HVAC systems supplied by companies like Mitsubishi Electric and Trane Canada. Such tariffs might inflate costs, impact supply chains, and necessitate strategic trade adaptations.


Canada's commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 is characterized by comprehensive plans and concrete actions encompassing legislation, industrial innovation, and international collaboration. As the global economic and regulatory landscape evolves, Canada's adaptive strategies in energy efficiency, supported by domestic incentives and resilient supply chains, will be crucial in maintaining momentum toward this ambitious climate goal. By balancing policy-driven initiatives with private sector engagement and international partnerships, Canada is poised to contribute meaningfully to the global fight against climate change.


S.N

January 24, 2025.



bottom of page